- #WILL MICROSOFT OFFICE 2002 WORK ON WINDOWS 8 DRIVER#
- #WILL MICROSOFT OFFICE 2002 WORK ON WINDOWS 8 UPGRADE#
- #WILL MICROSOFT OFFICE 2002 WORK ON WINDOWS 8 FULL#
- #WILL MICROSOFT OFFICE 2002 WORK ON WINDOWS 8 PC#
It was a great interface for tablets, but not for desktops.
#WILL MICROSOFT OFFICE 2002 WORK ON WINDOWS 8 PC#
Unfortunately, Microsoft got a little too enthusiastic with its new strategy, forcing its core customer base of desktop PC users to compromise their productivity for a new touchscreen-first interface called Metro. It saw the challenge to PCs posed by Apple’s iPhone and iPad (year-over-year PC sales began to drop in 2011) and decided to tackle it head-on with a crossover OS that could handle both touchscreens and desktop PCs. Windows 8 was a daring business move on Microsoft’s part.
![will microsoft office 2002 work on windows 8 will microsoft office 2002 work on windows 8](https://thumbnails-visually.netdna-ssl.com/one-drive-let-students-use-cheap-microsoft-office_5412ddc4f0d8e.jpg)
RELATED: What Is Windows RT, and How Is It Different from Windows 8? #3: Windows 8 (2012)
![will microsoft office 2002 work on windows 8 will microsoft office 2002 work on windows 8](https://www.howtogeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/vmware-unity-menu.png)
In the end, RT was more than just an embarrassment: The failure of Windows RT and the accompanying Surface RT hardware led to a $900 million loss for Microsoft in 2013. Third-party apps were forbidden, even if recompiled for ARM.
#WILL MICROSOFT OFFICE 2002 WORK ON WINDOWS 8 FULL#
And most of the Windows 8-specific apps in the Windows Store at the time weren’t very good.Įven worse, it teased full desktop support with a desktop mode that would only allow Microsoft desktop apps such as Microsoft Office. There was only one problem: It couldn’t run millions of Windows apps designed for Windows’ traditional x86 architecture. Microsoft crafted Windows RT as an ARM-based version of Windows that would run on a new class of lighter, more power-efficient machines like the Surface RT.
#WILL MICROSOFT OFFICE 2002 WORK ON WINDOWS 8 UPGRADE#
RELATED: Windows XP Users: Here Are Your Upgrade Options #4: Windows RT (2012) The release of Windows XP Service Pack 2 was a pivotal moment that made the operating system much more secure. Luckily, Microsoft continued to refine XP for years, and it eventually became a solid, stable OS that many were hesitant to give up. If you made significant changes to your computer’s hardware (such as installing a new hard drive or graphics card), Windows XP would require reactivation, which caused no shortage of headaches for some people in an era when always-on internet wasn’t a given. To prevent piracy, Microsoft required customers who built their own machines or upgraded to activate their copy of Windows XP over the internet or by telephone. There were also growing pains for Windows XP’s brand new activation system, which was a first in Windows at the time.
#WILL MICROSOFT OFFICE 2002 WORK ON WINDOWS 8 DRIVER#
But some of you might remember what XP was like before 2004’s Service Pack 2 release: a buggy mess with driver problems and huge security holes. Sure, after all the fixes, Windows XP was one of the greatest versions of Windows of all time.
![will microsoft office 2002 work on windows 8 will microsoft office 2002 work on windows 8](https://helpdeskgeek.com/wp-content/pictures/2009/12/control-panel-system.png)
RELATED: 35 Years of Microsoft Windows: Remembering Windows 1.0 #5: Windows XP (Initial Release, 2001)
![will microsoft office 2002 work on windows 8 will microsoft office 2002 work on windows 8](https://slidetodoc.com/presentation_image_h/141135bc76c82248e63d15365454e061/image-5.jpg)
Luckily for Microsoft, things got better: The average PC became powerful enough to handle Windows smoothly by the early 1990s. In 1986, The New York Times reviewed Windows 1.0 and wrote that “running Windows on a PC with 512K of memory is akin to pouring molasses in the Arctic.” Add in poor third-party support, and you had a true dud. Honestly, there’s no hard science to this, so you might not agree with our exact ranking, but we can confidently predict this: If you ran at least one of these versions of Windows, you wanted to upgrade.įor simplicity’s sake, we’re going to stick to full desktop versions of Windows (with the slight exception of an ARM-based detour), so more obscure server and PDA releases will be spared humiliation (for now).Īs a result, Windows 1.0 pushed the limits of a typical 1985 PC’s capabilities at the time, making it a memory hog that was too slow to use. For fun, we also googled “Windows Sucks,” and tallied up the results. In developing this list, we considered the following metrics: How much people hated each version (appearances on other worst-of lists), how poorly it sold, how slowly it was adopted, how bad its reviews were, the length of its lifespan on the market, and our own personal experiences with the software. Maybe we’ve experienced personal pain in wrestling with its bugs, or lost time reinstalling it over and over again, or heard stories about how often it’s crashed. Most of us know a bad version of Windows when we see it.